Current Problems:
- Apart from electing the mayor and councillors once every four years, the people have no sovereignty at all, and cannot even protect their own property.
- The people not only cannot remove an incompetent mayor or councillors, but also have no right to urge the replacement of subordinate officials who abuse their power or even infringe upon civil rights. The people can only be forced at will.
- The people have no right to correct the absurd and ridiculous rules formulated by the council and the municipal government, and can only watch helplessly as general decline and abandonment continue.
- When the people put forward good, scientifically feasible and necessary suggestions, they have no right to demand that the government must follow public opinion and implement them, even without the right to request a reply.
Whether a place can develop and whether the people can be happy depends on whether there is “human harmony”. As long as there is human harmony, even a desert can be turned into an oasis or a metropolis, like Dubai. If officials and the people are in opposition, and the broad masses of the people are deprived of sovereignty, the people’s wisdom, ability, and public conscience will be suppressed, wasted or warped, while officials can act unscrupulously, only needing to use their power to fabricate countless excuses. This puts the people and the government in a state of opposition, which is the fundamental reason why the people are suppressed, oppressed, lack motivation, why society stagnates and even continues to deteriorate.
In response to this, we must first implement the following:
- Establish a “Sovereignty Lies with the People” website, mainly setting up four major sections: allowing the people to directly exercise the right of initiative, the right of referendum, the right of recall, and the right of election.
Every voter only needs to enter their identity number and fingerprint on the “Sovereignty Lies with the People” website to publish any good initiative proposal, or propose amendments to existing policies, or demand the recall of the mayor. The government must respond within the specified time limit and participate in public discussion. After the discussion ends, if the government still rejects the proposal, the proposer may initiate a referendum.
During the referendum period, supporters only need to click to vote on the website. Opponents do not need to spend time expressing opposition. It is only necessary to wait until the specified deadline to see whether the number of supporters exceeds half of all voters. Only if more than half support it will it have legal effect, and the government and the public must implement it. If it does not exceed half, it will automatically become invalid to avoid occupying too much memory on the website.
Of course, after some time, anyone has the right to restart the proposal.
For this, we will scientifically set up measures to prevent faking on the website and stipulate sanctions against faking behavior, up to requesting the higher legislative body to stipulate corresponding penalties for violations and crimes, to ensure the smooth realization of sovereignty belonging to the people.
In the current situation there is only one election right every four years, yet people must concentrate on one day to vote at designated locations, resulting in exhaustion and waste of money and effort, so as to most people are disappointed with past mayoral elections, believing they are merely changing the soup but not the medicine, and are even less willing to vote. but, the election outcome only comes from the relative majority among the few who participate in voting — even if only three out of millions of voters cast ballots, winning with two votes would be enough to be elected. How can such a result be said to be much better than autocratic dictatorship where an fixed minority of about 10% rules the majority?! Once elected, they still monopolize all power, and even engage in more reckless abuse of power and seek personal gain, fearing that they will lose the opportunity to embezzle once they leave office in the next term — from bad to worse.
- In order for the whole people to accurately and excellently propose various motions, citizens must be allowed to freely, equally and fully review all administrative materials of the government and consult relevant staff, provided that they are not used for private purposes and do not violate private privacy rights, etc.
- Any citizen also has the right to attend the largest regular meetings convened by the government and parliament, and during the final period, has the right to take turns to question government leaders and fully speak and debate.
- If residents are dissatisfied with any government official, they shall first request the mayor to handle it. If they are still dissatisfied with the mayor’s handling, citizens shall also have the right to directly recall the official through the referendum procedure.
Only in this way can we completely eliminate the opposition between officials and the people and officials oppressing the people, and return to the true nature of politics: politics is the affairs of the public, and officials are the servants of the people! Electing me as mayor is nothing more than everyone, as masters, jointly choosing the most trustworthy servant or nanny. You — the people and all citizens — are the real mayor — truly and always holding the highest master power! Yet you do not need to bear the mayor’s responsibilities — the responsibility is still borne by me as mayor and the government head, until you recall me!
This is the normal and reasonable relationship between the government and the people: the people are the principals, and the government is merely the agent. The government exercises power only within the scope authorized by the people, and must obtain the prior consent of the people or subsequent ratification. The people also have the right to revoke the agent’s authority at any time due to loss of trust in government officials and choose another agent. Therefore, we promise to return the decision-making power over all matters and the power to decide on personnel to all voters.
Throughout history and in all countries, it has always been officials governing the people, with the people obeying the officials. The work of the government is called administration, can enforce by compulsion, only need with so-called crime of obstructing official duties — even if it is merely resisting clearly unreasonable or even illegal administrative acts, or even acts where the procedures themselves are illegal —the government can pursues the person criminal liability, may even beat the person to death on the spot. It only needs to frame the victim as having broken the law, while the clearly law-breaking and criminal officials actually enjoy “sovereign immunity.” Just like the case where federal immigration police in the United States, operating under the Anglo-American legal system, brutally killed a legal citizen in Minnesota, and the perpetrators escaped justice while the innocent victims received no compensation at all.
so,where is this a democratic society that protects human rights? It is simply more evil than ancient monarchical autocratic states: at least ancient monarchical states stipulated that even princes who broke the law would be punished the same as commoners! Officials at all levels and low-level law enforcers were even less exempt?! Even in the British Commonwealth to which Canada is attached, the British Empire only secretly maintained the perverse tradition of “the King may do no wrong(The king cannot be at fault because all the people, property and resources of the country belong to the king’s private property. The king has the right to dispose of the property at will, including the lives of the people, and shall not be held accountable for any actions).” How can all civil servants serving the King be allowed to act including seizing civilians’ property and causing loss of human lives arbitrarily and lawlessly too?!
Logical dissection reveals extreme terror upon careful thought! In reality, government violations of civil rights occur at any time. How can all ordinary citizens not live in incomparable fear as if in a terror society? How can they not be tense day and night, violating the physiological instincts of the nervous system? This makes them even more prone to physiological weakness than ignorant wild animals. Those who formulate and support such reactionary rules, because they actively and on the largest scale violate their own instincts for integrity and empathy (sympathy) required by the autonomic nervous system and mirror neurons, cause constant conflicts between the central nervous system and other nervous systems in all matters, keeping the sympathetic nervous system in an excited state. This further causes endocrine disorders, decreased immunity, premature cell death, and decline of stem cells, which inevitably offsets the energy of their own superhuman happiness. Together with the oppressed and deprived broad masses of ordinary people, they are hopelessly and rapidly entering the countdown of life! (please see【Warm Reminder】https://wwwhll.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Warm-reminder.htm)
This is the latest conclusion of life science research. It is our natural science discovery for seeking the highest happiness for everyone and helping everyone, especially the powerful and wealthy live healthy and long lives. Please do not choose to ignore it just because the mainstream scientific community has not yet confirmed it. It must be noted that the so-called mainstream scientific community itself is extremely despicable — please refer to the special article on this website [On the Fatal Flaws of the Contemporary Scientific Community — Only by Implementing a Scientific Democratic System Can We Usher in Scientific Truth]https://wwwhll.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/On-the-Institutional-Viruses-and-Cancerization-of-the-Contemporary-Scientific-Community.htm
So, can we rely on the “separation of three powers with internal checks and balances” mechanism realized in Western societies to prevent abuse of power and corruption? At the federal constitutional level, we dare not comment recklessly, but we objectively analyze based on the structure of this city:
Separation of three powers means that the government, parliament, and judiciary independently exercise different powers: executive (law enforcement), legislative, and adjudicative relief, checking each other and maintaining balance. However, regimes like this city have full integration of legislative and executive powers; the mayor is also a member of the parliament. There is no court at the city level; only the provincial court can adjudicate. However, the court system is almost not subject to any checks from other powers, almost like divine power adjudicating human affairs! Yet financially, it relies on support from the executive and parliament — and money is the actual master of contemporary society! The result can just be imagined?
Therefore, in Fort Erie, we unprecedentedly let the whole people “constrain government governing power with people’s sovereignty,” which is also a move of necessity. Only in this way can these fundamental defects be perfectly resolved, achieving an eternal virtuous cycle in one stroke. “Sovereignty belongs to the people” will no longer remain only the highest principle on the surface of national constitutions but will be truly, comprehensively, conveniently, and supremely realized first in Fort Erie!
Switzerland has implemented the referendum system for hundreds of years, making it the society with the highest happiness index in the world. Why can’t we do it? Switzerland, Taiwan, etc., have only set excessively high thresholds for referendums, violating the basic principle of equality for all, resulting in their societies being far from satisfactory. Referendums are like drawing a cake to satisfy hunger. Why can’t we solve it perfectly and thoroughly in one go?!
Reform should be the uncompromised realization in accordance with scientific laws and the public conscience of all people. Any discount will make the virtuous cycle unsustainable, and over time, it will lead to a vicious cycle again! Therefore, we must not only resolutely realize this perfect politics of people’s sovereignty but also implement a brand-new economic system in tandem, and keep pace with the times by implementing the most beautiful, exciting methods for happiness and longevity that can perfectly elevate human society — these will be reported to everyone when everyone are ready, ok?
