https://youtu.be/lliaabTMbg4?si=H7fSRw8GPMl4msWNThis video features a journalist’s real interview with over 160 federal lawmakers, but unfortunately, due to privacy concerns, the footage cannot be shown】

As everyone knows, as long as one does not follow the laws of nature, one will everywhere fall into contradiction and confrontation with nature: either one is obstructed everywhere, or one destroys nature. As long as one does not follow the fairness of the people’s will, yet still pretends that the people are electing and choosing, then, because the people are not an ignorant force of nature but are equally intelligent or even more intelligent human beings, those in power must rely on more lies and pseudo-science to cover up previous lies. They become exhausted in dealing with this, remain constantly trapped in self-contradiction, and fall into a vicious cycle; or they simply suppress people, causing themselves to stay tense and guarded, living in panic day after day, and then falling into a dead cycle!

1. From the origin of modern elections, one can clearly understand that they are merely a falsification and cannot possibly make themselves true.

The allowance in human society for the people to elect a parliament originated in thirteenth-century England. At that time, countries throughout the world were ruled by royal families. The wealthy class in English society dared to resist the king’s family monopolizing all power, but only wanted to let these upper-level people among the private population also have the opportunity to become those in power. In the end, they reached a compromise with the king: the king’s empty position would be retained, while actual power would be exercised by upper-level persons, but the personnel could not be fixed, so as to avoid becoming new dictators.

Only because there was no way to fix a rotation in office did they have to use periodic elections by the people as the standard or condition for their internal rotation. That is to say, from beginning to end, the whole population was positioned merely as spectators guaranteeing their peaceful rotation, and there was absolutely no intention of returning power to the people. At that time, there was simply no concept that sovereignty belonged to the people.

Afterward, all laws promulgated by England were also limited to this. Whenever they felt that too many rules would restrict their dictatorship and behind-the-scenes manipulation, they firmly refused to legislate, so as to preserve their convenience in abusing power and handling matters arbitrarily. As a result, although modern countries throughout the world have completed legal systems headed by constitutions, Britain and many Commonwealth countries still stubbornly refuse complete legislation, and need only sophistically proclaim it to be ‘unwritten law’; in substance, this equals rule by men without law, equals illegal arbitrariness!

This caused its judicial trials to become even more evil than the previous autocratic rule of royal power! The judiciary is almost absolutely dictatorial, and no longer even has to be loyal to an emperor. In countries such as Canada, there is no emperor; they only pretend that they still need to be loyal to a non-existent (British) king. In reality, this is to allow themselves to exercise supreme dictatorial power while shifting the target onto an optional foreign king: toward the broad masses of ordinary people, they can act as they please and treat human life as grass; toward governmental infringement of rights, they can act opportunistically based on the need to balance various powers.

In order to continue numbing the people with its illegal rule, it also set up something called equity, allowing judges to decide cases according to ‘free conviction,’ and even allowing senior judges to create law on their own, acting both as adjudicators and as legislators. Moreover, the ‘law’ they themselves create can be changed at will or interpreted wildly.

If one says that administrative officials openly put on the posture of ‘I am a rogue, whom should I fear?’, then the judicial institution laughs obscenely to itself: ‘I am a rogue, and you actually believe me?!’ In all cases, ordinary people are forced, after having already been victimized, to spend huge sums hiring lawyers, precisely so that professional lawyers can be good at bribing judges.

If both sides are ordinary people, then the money of the winning side is almost entirely, or for the most part, divided as spoils between the lawyers and judges, while the risk must be settled by the lawyer. The two simplest ways for the lawyer to settle it are: after charging a basic fee, the lawyer also charges by the hour, and how many hours there are is calculated arbitrarily by the lawyer, in any case until there is basically no extra money left; at the same time, the client (the winning party) is required to keep confidentiality, otherwise the winning party must pay compensation in reverse. The losing side, especially an injured plaintiff, must directly pay the opposing side’s lawyers and the same judge in reverse!

This is enough to show that judges in the Anglo-American legal system are entirely the most vicious criminals in the universe! They surpass all reactionary judges in human history who, in one case, ate only from one party; these judges almost eat from both sides!

If a party refuses to hire a lawyer, then the judge, becoming angry from embarrassment, simply drags you to death, tires you to death, and traps you to death procedurally. In any case, even procedural law is chaotic, or there is simply a lack of such things as trial time limits and fee standards. The judge only needs to create pretexts and force you to pay fees repeatedly, while still being able to refuse to formally open the court. Even if the court finally opens, the judge can, without any reason, rule that you lose and make you pay compensation in reverse! In any case, the ruling party and the many parties waiting in line—the opposition parties—derived from this so-called universal suffrage system have gradually solidified into so-called multiple political parties. Yet not one party is responsible to the whole people.

 This is worse than rule by a king personally and by his family; at least an individual king would still somewhat take into account all his slaves or their property. These political parties know only how to seek private gain by abusing power by any means. When the people demand that the ruling party take responsibility, the party simply ignores them, and even speaks with apparent justification, seizing on the issue to say: we are not the ruling party of a one-party dictatorship; we have no power and no responsibility to supervise the judiciary or all other government organs and officials; you can only go to the government. When the people go to the government, they say they can only wait for the next new government; who told you not to allow this party to have fixed hegemony? Thus it falls into a self-contradictory dead cycle: the more fixed hegemony is not allowed, the less responsibility there is to the people; yet the more fixed hegemony exists, the more the people have no hope to begin with!

When voters question constituency representatives, every one of them can comfortably shirk all responsibility: I am only a legislator, I am not responsible for administration and the judiciary, and I may be rotated out at any time, so I am not responsible for the long term. Administrative officials directly reject voters: we were only chosen by parliament, and are responsible only to parliament. Even in the American system of separation of powers, the chief executive, the president, outwardly needs to cope for a moment, but inwardly does not care at all: you voters are truly naive; who do you think you are? Do you think we were really chosen by you? In fact, it was merely handed over to me by my predecessor, who let me come forward to wipe up after them, and I must still divide the spoils with them. The logical pattern lies in this—

2. The Interlocking Legal Safeguards of Contemporary Western Election Fraud — The Comprehensive Poison of the Relative Majority Vote System.

For this, they only need to define the so-called democratic system as universal suffrage, and universal suffrage only requires obtaining a relative majority of votes. That is, there is no requirement for all eligible voters to cast ballots — which is of course very difficult to achieve. But they refuse to use the total number of all eligible voters as the base and require a fair majority (over 50%) to be elected. Instead, they stipulate that even if only three people out of hundreds of millions of voters cast ballots, a candidate can win with a majority: two votes (possibly cast by himself and his wife) and proudly take office! While the opponent only gets one vote. Too bad he’s single, right? Hehe!

Their so-called social science theoretical basis is: it is not that they prevent voters from voting, but that voters voluntarily give up their rights. Since the government cannot stop functioning, the one with the relative majority of votes must take office.

As for why they do not use the total number of all eligible voters as the base to require a true majority — a passing grade? They claim that the exact number of qualified voters is unclear and difficult to count accurately, or that it is prone to fraud. Often, only those who are themselves fraudsters are extremely sensitive to others committing fraud!

As for why a powerful government with both soft and hard means cannot even clearly determine the number of qualified voters? It is because they allow residents nationwide not to register, not to apply for or obtain a unified citizen identification number.

It is evident that the real reason Western governments permit such chaos is not so-called personal freedom for the people, including illegal immigrants, but this: since an accurate number of voters cannot be obtained, they can only implement the relative majority vote system, which facilitates election fraud.

In this way, Western so-called democracy systematically slides into a state more absurd and shameless than rule without elections. It merely wastes human and material resources, and traps the people in a state of seemingly plausible numbness, unaware of the root causes and patterns — which is precisely the result of deliberate self-dumbing of the populace that they wish to achieve.

In fact, this trivial trick can be completely resolved by simply stipulating that in every election, a candidate must obtain more than half of all eligible voters’ votes to be elected. If no one reaches that threshold, the incumbent continues to hold office.

This would motivate those opposing the incumbent to go out and vote, and also encourage good and capable people to run for office, touching people’s hearts with their noble character and scientific abilities. After all, justice resides in the hearts of the people! This ensures that when people opposed to the incumbent go to vote, there are truly good candidates to choose from — meaning both destruction of the old and establishment of the new!

If we further stipulate that as long as a good official wins deep support from the people, there is no fixed term limit for re-election — just as when we hire a chief executive or a nanny, we would never say you can only serve one term and must be re-elected in four years! We would only say: as long as you do well, you can stay indefinitely and we can live together like one family! Only this can foster full trust between officials and the people, eliminate suspicion, and enable united efforts.

However, this must be accompanied by the right to recall at any time! It only requires more than half of all citizens to agree to recall an official. In this way, the vicious cycle transforms into a virtuous cycle: only good people can be elected and remain in office, without having to regularly deal with nitpicking opposition for opposition’s sake, which causes unnecessary internal friction and even half-finished efforts that harm both others and themselves.

Of course, to prevent any good and capable person from making mistakes, relying solely on recall is not enough. The key is that if a good leader is recalled simply for unintentional mistakes, it would be a pity; but tolerating too many small mistakes could accumulate into big ones. Therefore, everyone must simultaneously be granted the right to joint decision-making on matters, with the direct power to initiate referendums, initiative rights, and national plebiscites. This allows everyone to supervise and propose on all issues before any recall, ensuring decisions are correct and in line with the people’s will, with no mistakes!

Only by combining the right of recall with the right of by-election, and letting the power to choose people and the power to decide affairs complement each other, can a complete virtuous cycle be formed. The key is that the exercise of these four powers must all require more than half of the entire population’s approval — this is both a mathematical law and the simplest, most intuitive standard.

The relative majority election system in Western society is like students taking exams: as long as they get a relative majority of scores, even if far below passing (usually 60 points) or qualified, they can still enter university. The result is that no one loves studying, everyone performs poorly, but as long as they are slightly better than the worse ones, they get admitted. Canada’s university admission is even more ridiculous. To cover up the shame, they simply abolish exams altogether, calling it “holistic assessment based on daily performance.” Not only is daily homework far from scientific, it is also not strict and often lacks accountability. The key to learning lies in the final comprehensive practical ability assessment, which must rely on unified, rigorous, and comprehensive examinations. Letting almost all unqualified and failing students directly enter university — the consequences are obvious.

Just as they create and tolerate such intellectual weakness in school, university education, and even the top scientific community, the goal is to ensure that the broad masses and their descendants can never surpass them, and can never have a complete rational understanding of the entire society or even nature itself. Therefore, not only is Western-led social science fundamentally unscientific, but because it is completely detached from natural laws and natural science, it cannot be scientific. Even in the field of natural science, they refuse to let students strengthen comprehensive, integrated learning of all natural laws and natural sciences while conducting rigorous, specialized study in divided disciplines.

Of course, the entire scientific community has not yet discovered or proven the basic (general) laws of nature, and has difficulty achieving comprehensive, profound, and essential understanding. This also leads to chaos in many classified sciences where opinions differ and change unpredictably — which is not the necessity or should-be of science, but because the scientific community in fact practices an anti-scientific hierarchical dictatorship. This is the deepest, decisive root cause of all disasters for the entire world and all humanity!

Because everyone, including dignitaries, still believes in science. When science itself engages in massive fraud, especially when life sciences are fundamentally distorted, the dignitaries are deeply misled from the bottom of their hearts. Under the pseudoscientific conclusion that humans can only live around 120 years, they indulge in immediate pleasures without considering consequences or the long term. Especially under the fallacy that they can continuously extend life just by updating drugs and biotechnology, such as genetic modification and stem cell replacement, they disregard everything, despise the interests and lives of the people, and exhaust all natural resources. In reality, this is all an excuse for the life technology industry to seek huge profits by producing numerous so-called health-preserving and longevity products or services — or the tragedy of them being misled themselves! (See the patent on this website: 【The Fatal Cancer of Modern Science】)

Under such patterns, their political consensus is: to make the vast electorate disappointed with each government, thoroughly disappointed, so disappointed that they don’t even vote. Only we professional politicians and our cliques will join in the fun, taking turns sitting on the dirty throne and dividing the spoils. Moreover, it is well known that as long as direct democracy is not implemented and the people are not allowed to exercise decision-making power equally, and the ruling party takes turns deciding everything, they will only exhaust all means to seek private benefits for their party and core members. They only need tacit understanding, or superficially attack each other on irrelevant minor issues that do not hinder the major channels for those in power to seek personal gain — especially the avenues and scope of legal corruption. The most obvious example is Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan, where ruling and opposition party members often stage fake conflicts. They are not afraid of exposure and appear very dutiful, but on how to plug systemic loopholes and corruption opportunities, both sides maintain tacit agreement. For example, they harshly criticize the ruling party for judicial injustice and political persecution of the opposition, but never implement direct election and recall of judges by the people. They accuse the ruling party of manipulating budgets and arms procurement deals behind closed doors, but neither side allows national referendums on budget final accounts, etc. All this is simply to ensure that when we take power next time, we can intensify corruption even more!

Otherwise, since everyone seeks a job to make money — big money — how can this group of people, who take running for office and governing as their lifelong career, be an exception?! They not only want to seek profit, but also to surpass everyone, including the top private tycoons: to gain both fame and fortune, and wield power arrogantly! Hmph, what are private tycoons? Aren’t they still subservient to me? They don’t even have the honor of being officials! “If being an official doesn’t make you rich, I wouldn’t come even if invited” — this is their eternal creed and the common bottom line when attacking each other. They even mock officials in one-party systems for being stupid enough to openly admit this.

As a result, in every election, the vast majority of the people never vote. It is almost only a minority who vote. Therefore, politicians know that voters who dare to question them generally did not vote for them. It’s already good if officials don’t retaliate against you — how can you expect them to help you?! Even if you warn that you will vote for their opponent, they don’t care. In fact, the main supporters of the so-called opponents also understand the inside story. They only need to reward according to merit and share in the spoils; they won’t question officials either. Of course, if one’s own governance is too bad and hard to clean up or they are too lazy to fix it, they reach a tacit understanding with “insiders” (those who uphold this parasitic system) or simply exchange knowing glances, letting the surface opponent take a turn. They step down temporarily to rest. When the replacement does even worse, the people still feel that “I am not the worst,” and let them make a comeback — while the people remain crushed under the mountain.

The perverse result now is that the regime falls into a vicious cycle, trapping the entire society in a dead loop!

Because as long as the government officials who mainly collect people’s property taxes are merely parasites firmly attached to the people’s bodies, they can eat their fill every day and subjectively have no motivation. Moreover, under the private land ownership system, the government objectively has little room to act. In addition, elections are mainly about competing to be more foolish, more evil, and more vicious. Subjectively, they have almost no relevant abilities — not even comparable to officials in ancient China after imperial examinations. Although the West and Taiwan have so-called civil service examination systems, those who pass can only become administrative officials and must obey the immoral and incompetent political officials. Since serving one or more terms yields little achievement and they have no desire to achieve anything, why are these professional politicians so keen — even at all costs — to run for office and establish full-time election parties, without engaging in any positive economic, scientific, or business activities that society and the people need? What exactly are they after? What do they want to do? It goes without saying. Between them, there is tacit understanding. On the need to deceive the outside world and the people, and to maintain opportunities for corruption, they are of one mind, even connected by telepathy, without needing collusion or betrayal — because their parties and candidates share only one main common enemy: the entire ordinary populace — the broad masses of common people who are attached and sucked dry by the parasitic government. Private business owners, especially family operators without employees, are all victims and blood-sucked targets of the evil government regime. Even when private employers have to suppress workers’ wages to reduce costs, that is simply the economic instinct of business operation, without any unilateral coercive state power. It is completely voluntary and consensual between both parties, fundamentally different from the Western government’s tyranny of using police, courts, and even the military to forcibly collect taxes and impose various penalties. There is no comparability at all. It is clear that the traditional communist theory of Marxism, which criticizes the bourgeoisie and defines the root of Western decadence and reaction as the capitalist system, is fundamentally wrong! It neither digs deep into its evil essence and fatal social cancer, nor identifies the correct enemy. Instead, it has been exploited by Western regime politicians to mislead the public. Therefore, it should be abandoned!

3. They can also completely block righteous people from successfully being elected through rule-of-man laws and lawless judicial dictatorship.

A. Righteous individuals can be directly “shot down” when applying for candidate qualifications.

Although the surface rules allow anyone to register and become an official candidate by obtaining a small number of voter signatures, they also set up a candidate qualification review process, just like in Russia, Iran, and other Eastern countries. The key is that the review is conducted through internal government dictatorship procedures that are not public. When a candidate is ruled unqualified, there is no need to publish specific reasons or evidence.

Although the victimized candidate can apply to the court for judicial review, it is often too late. The critical point is that Western courts do not set trial deadlines and can arbitrarily delay until after the general election. The plaintiff must bear expensive evidence-collection costs themselves. In the end, almost without exception, the victim loses the case and even has to pay unlimited compensation and legal fees to the government. This is designed to deter other candidates from taking Western elections seriously.

B. Various normal campaign activities can be ruled as violations, allowing candidates to be disqualified midway.

Even after obtaining candidate status, different regions have different rules, many of which are vague. For example, one rule states that no campaign-related activities are allowed before registration. Once the government needs to, it can use this as a pretext to cancel a candidate’s qualification. When such candidates sue, judges may completely deny them the opportunity for open court debate. Extremely dictatorial judges can directly dismiss the plaintiff’s lawsuit on the grounds that “the plaintiff has no chance of winning,” while still refusing to refund the litigation fees!

This is tantamount to openly admitting that the courts are the masterminds, fraudsters, bullies, and chief culprits behind government infringements.

C. Final vote counting offers absolutely no hope.

The most tragic part is that righteous candidates often have much higher poll ratings than incumbents and hold an absolute advantage. However, vote counting after voting is required to be done manually by government staff who read and record the ballots. There is no full live broadcast to the public, so ballots can be read incorrectly and numbers can be recorded wrongly on purpose, with deliberate misattribution and substitution.

Small parties and especially independent candidates have almost no ability to supervise at numerous counting stations. In the end, results are not announced on the spot but are taken back inside government offices for “processing” before being released — the outcome is predictable! This is also why Western governments can confidently accuse countries like Venezuela of vote fraud — it is like the pot calling the kettle black, with the small witch meeting the big witch.

The announced results are often extremely polarized. Either the righteous candidate gets the second-highest number of votes and loses, with officials smirking and saying “Welcome to try again next time (as a runner-up), don’t be polite!” After all, Western society is usually extremely boring, and such public spectacles are rare. Or they announce that the righteous candidate only received very few votes — to infuriate and crush you completely, making you lose both reputation and benefit. Meanwhile, they themselves gain both fame and fortune — well, fortune for sure, but do they still have any good reputation?

In this way, Western elections inevitably produce even more nauseating ugly scenes (see the earlier interviews with over 160 federal parliamentarians) —

4. No need to compete on character or ability — they only need to compete on who is more stupid, more bizarre, and more evil!

A. Competing on stupidity.

Only by being stupid, and more stupid, can they stick rigidly to old ways, refuse improvement, and maintain the essence of the Western system — a parasitic and fascist tyranny that is even more evil than slavery. They are satisfied with the vicious cycle of sucking blood from the entire population every day. As for it also being a dead loop, they don’t care, because everyone has been misled by the corrupt scientific community created by the dictatorial hierarchy: “Humans can only live up to around 120 years, so enjoy immediate pleasures and ignore the long term, as well as others.”

Therefore, it has become an unspoken convention that most of them respond to voters’ questions with “I don’t know,” to avoid being thoroughly questioned and unable to justify themselves. Even when they hold debates to meet public expectations and add some entertainment to Western society’s monotonous and boring life (which lacks free public gatherings), they set limits on speech topics, prohibit free audience questions and follow-ups, keep issues simple to divert public attention, and strictly limit answers to two minutes. The purpose is to prevent those who want to break these rotten rules and showcase real talent from fully expressing themselves. In other words: if everyone must be stupid, then we shall all be equally stupid! And they still act self-righteous about such farces?

In Canada, reporters once tracked and interviewed many federal parliamentarians. Their confessions were shocking: “We don’t know why we ran for office. We don’t know how we got elected. After being elected, we don’t even know what we did for years.” It seems the political arena is April Fool’s Day every day.

B. Competing on being bizarre.

Because being merely stupid invites too much criticism and ridicule, they must engage in mystification and weird tricks. Most politicians have no ability to do any serious work, but they cannot remain completely idle, so they rack their brains to create all kinds of bizarre and crooked paths, while pretending to be elegant — such as supporting same-sex marriage, gender fluidity, and other endless topics. In particular, when interest groups lobby, they legalize power-for-money deals, and the most profitable ones are often the shady paths.

After all, bizarre and crooked ways are easy to yield huge profits with no capital, and they can further mislead and fool the public — such as legalizing drugs, flooding society with gambling, and rampant sex trade. Since people have been brainwashed from childhood with “happy and fun” education, it is hard for them to judge correctly. Their physiological structure makes them good at looking forward and even seeing through things, but poor at association, reflection, and drawing from many sources. Their logical reasoning is inevitably incomplete and incorrect.

Thus, each tries to outdo the other in weirdness, trapping people deeper and deeper. People don’t know how to choose and can only pick the lesser evil, or simply the greater evil — like willingly degenerating, self-anesthetizing until they end up homeless and living a life worse than death.

C. Even competing on who is more evil!

As long as politicians are ferocious toward foreign countries — especially those with different so-called ideologies — even if they act like pirates, their supporters regard them as national heroes. For example, U.S. President Trump openly sent troops to seize oil tankers. As long as they are ruthless toward domestic minorities and foreign immigrants, their supporters tolerate it and feel superior, as if “finally someone is worse off than me.” They can even kick people when they are down and gloat, completely ignoring that the next victim could be themselves.

Because government officials also target all ordinary citizens, righteous people, morally good people, and scientifically capable people —

5. The most insidious routine ultimate move: Sovereign immunity, one-vote veto, black-box operations, etc., completely eliminating citizens’ right to righteous resistance.

The so-called sovereign immunity was originally only applicable in diplomacy between sovereign states to demonstrate equality between countries. It must never be used within a single country. Moreover, in a truly democratic society, sovereignty belongs to the people — this is the foundational cornerstone confirmed by the constitutions of Western countries. The American Declaration of Independence and the French Constitution have always affirmed this supreme principle. If immunity must exist, it should belong to the people as a whole — as in “the law does not punish the crowd” and “an evil law is not a law.”

However, the Anglo-American legal system has completely overturned this rational understanding and stolen the concept: when any official infringes on people’s rights or even kills innocent citizens without cause, they only need to claim they were enforcing the law or acting in the national interest to be exempted from crime. The government does not need to pay any compensation and can even slander the victim for obstructing official duties. The fact that American ICE agents openly killed two U.S. citizens and walked free is an extremely terrifying example of this logic!

Compared to the darkness of American justice, the Canadian government is even worse. The entire legal system does not even grant citizens property rights! Even self-defense in criminal law does not include protecting one’s own property. As a result, the biggest and most frequent infringer on Canadian people’s property is none other than government officials! As long as officials claim they are enforcing the law, they can openly demolish private houses and rob private property! Victims who call the police get no help and are warned by police not to resist with force. They can only watch helplessly as their property is illegally robbed by officials, and can only sue afterward. Yet the provincial superior courts, after repeatedly charging the victims various litigation and motion fees, can directly dismiss the plaintiff’s case on the grounds that the defendant enjoys “sovereign immunity.” They may not even allow the plaintiff to speak a single word, and the ruling does not even need to mention the case details!

This is rubbing salt into the victim’s wounds and adding frost to snow! No matter how much you complain or accuse, there is no recourse. Canada’s so-called integrity supervision agencies, judicial investigation commissions, and attorneys general are all虚设 when it comes to ordinary citizens — they simply do not respond. This huge interlocking apparatus is nothing but shackles looped around the people’s necks, accomplices in continued fraud and extortion of the people’s money. It is designed to torment the people and victims until they lose all hope and perish!

It is clear that Western “judicial independence” is fundamentally the creation of the most dictatorial devils on earth! It only plays a role in balancing power within the ruling group, yet short-sighted people and careerists in society falsely call it the protector of human rights. This is a complete inversion of black and white, seriously contrary to facts and logic!

Such evil is worse than any dictatorial autocratic empire in human history! At least in ancient China, successive dynasties stipulated that “if a prince breaks the law, he shall be punished the same as a commoner!” Particularly after the imperial examination system was implemented, it allowed people from all backgrounds to take the exams equally. Those who passed could directly serve as local officials, even rising to become the emperor’s son-in-law. Many good and honest officials across the country came from ordinary families based on genuine talent and learning. This enabled ancient China to lead the world for thousands of years, recognized as the Central Kingdom, enjoying relative peace and prosperity, and attracting tribute from all nations.

In contrast, the West, especially the Anglo-American legal system, is extremely insidious. Because it has never been openly and explicitly stated in law, the world remains unaware. Otherwise, this alone would be enough to terrify all humanity, making people never want to immigrate again, or even set foot in the United States or Canada again. Because apart from occupying the world’s naturally best geographical locations through robbery and the inertial technological accumulation before the Nobel Prize era, the West is fundamentally a negative number. The larger the GDP they boast on the surface, the greater the negative figure, and the greater, deeper, and more tragic the harm. Overall, they are only sliding down an evil path — a path of self-destruction! The most prominent manifestations are: the local population is shrinking, the wealth gap is widening, mental health is deteriorating, and everyone’s lifespan is not only far shorter than what nature should allow, but also worse than many developing countries (see the special article on this website analyzing population growth and decline worldwide and its profound causes).

It is clear that the reason Western countries such as the United States and Canada can still attract relatively good immigrants is purely due to surface-level falsehoods and deception, as well as their occupation of the world’s best and most extensive geographical environment and resources! Yet nature should rightfully belong to all humanity to share equally!

Even in the only so-called democratic election, American presidential elections have legal procedures that allow fraud — the so-called Electoral College system. That is, even after the popular vote, the winner is not determined directly by relative majority. Instead, fictitious electors from each state vote again. These electors do not even exist in reality; votes are allocated according to the number of seats each state is assigned. The key is that these state electors can override the popular vote results of their own state! Such a setup completely allows dictatorship and rigged elections!

Although Canadian law does not directly stipulate that a minority can ultimately veto or change the will of the majority, fraud can easily occur at two major stages: After candidates register, only the incumbent chief executive has the dictatorial power to decide whether the registration is valid. Moreover, the review is not conducted immediately. They wait until just before voting to suddenly announce the decision, without providing specific reasons or evidence. Even if the victim applies for judicial review, it is either too late or they lack evidence. If the court is asked to investigate, it requires enormous costs. And if the victim loses the case, they must pay huge compensation to the government instead! Of course, the courts and the government protect each other. With such traps, ordinary civilian candidates have only a dead end!

Even when they allow incumbent mayors and others to manipulate public opinion and show off their arrogance and excitement, as long as internal assessments show the candidate cannot replace the incumbent or their own people, they still let the candidate pass registration and participate in the election under the guise of fairness. But once the election situation is in crisis, they will use any means to restrict, exclude, and suppress dissenting candidates. Especially when they see unfavorable situations at various polling stations during counting, they forcibly use the fact that only the government controls all vote counting and statistics. Other candidates have no way to supervise, allowing them to manipulate all ballots behind the scenes. As a result, the final count almost always shows them winning — unless the incumbent has taken enough and voluntarily steps aside. In that case, they hypocritically fabricate vote numbers for some candidate. Either they infuriate you to death so you run again next time as their political plaything until you are exhausted of manpower and money, or they deliberately humiliate you to make you give up completely. You end up neither inside nor outside — completely trapped!

Can such an extremely evil election system really be better than having no regular elections at all? It is like —

6. The last so-called advantage left in Western society: Freedom of speech. Its limitations and logical phenomena.

However, Western countries have no public media. Even if there were public media, they would still be controlled by bureaucratic dictatorship. Yet they would at least care about the highest leaders for the sake of public interest and cross-report public sentiments. That is, although public media dare not expose or criticize local officials, they can still target officials from other places — unless those officials manage to collude with local ones to apply pressure. But if society only has private media, ordinary civilians have almost no opportunity to make their voices heard. Private media do not so much enable free speech as sell speech. When they pursue higher private interests, even if you pay, you cannot buy public expression! This is why Western media almost never report on numerous innocent victims, but only report on the killers for bloody excitement. It is like encouraging the rule of the jungle — strike first and the weak are prey to the strong. They even “civilly” describe killers as “gunmen,” as if murder is just a normal profession or a video game!

It is evident that their so-called civilized speech is actually allowing everyone to kill freely and slaughter each other, so that a tiny ruling class can reap the benefits or divide and conquer. Their freedom means the people only have the freedom to curse government officials, while officials have the shameless freedom to act as they please and abuse their power. It becomes a contest of whose freedom is stronger. Since officials hold absolute power and take turns sitting on the dirty throne, each one becomes “I’m a hooligan, who am I afraid of?” The arrogant and shameless behavior of U.S. President Trump is the malignant expansion caused by this system. The more you curse him, the more excited he becomes. It is not that they want to protect freedom of speech, but that they want to infuriate you to death! Just like their drug and alcohol addiction, they have long trained personalities beyond ordinary imagination. With all five poisons attacking their hearts, why would they fear curses? They might even welcome poison against poison.

7. Derived consequences: From freedom of speech to painful self-imprisonment and distortion, causing Western society to lose its last advantage.

Under such a vicious cycle passed down through generations, almost the entire population has become thoroughly disappointed with anyone who wants to enter politics. They apply preconceived stereotypes and blanket judgments, refusing to believe there can still be good and capable public servants. They don’t even look at good people’s platforms, to the point of pain where they avoid talking about politics and elections altogether — even reacting as if talking about a taboo. Or, because their lives are mainly immersed in happy play-style education, fictional stories, stimulating games, religious chanting, etc., they dislike or even detest reading rigorous scientific political platforms, and even develop an instinct to reject and refuse scientific papers.

This is exactly what the dignitaries want. The problem is that, according to new principles of biological and life sciences, these initiators cannot escape the physiological laws of harming others while harming themselves. That is why, although they embezzle and devour national wealth and suck the blood of the people day and night, they also suffer more severe damage to their own three major nervous systems, resulting in shorter lives (less than one percent of natural lifespan). It is absolutely incurable!

(The solution for universal harmony, where everyone enjoys beauty, happiness, and longevity, is fully presented in the general principles and specific discussions on this website regarding administrative agency, sovereignty belonging to the people, etc.)

---