 | |||
| |||
Here are the reviews:
We understand the intent and theme of Harris’s timely concession speech, but it has to be said that it has a major flaw: She should have started only with a brief statement frist: acknowledging defeat, promising a peaceful transition of power, but never relinquishing responsibility! Then, wait until the total number of votes cast by all voters received by each candidate is announced, and then make an in-depth and comprehensive summary speech. Because —
If she has more votes than Trump (like the result of Hillary versus Trump last time), she has no choice but to abide by the Constitution and accept defeat, and at the same time, she should point out the serious distortion of the American election system to democracy, and put forward a fair and just, scientific and feasible solution (see my other substantive paper published). In the name of the federal government, put to a national referendum last or first all things which I have repeatedly suggested, especially such constitutional matters, since the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States establish the most important principle of all: exercise the sovereignty by all people,It is natural, then, that the Constitution should be amended by a referendum, and that the absence of such an amendment procedure in the Constitution should not preclude popular sovereignty.It can only be said that there are omissions and contradictions in the Constitution itself, which should make up for this provision of direct democracy. Justice can be late, but it is indispensable! In this way, we can kill two birds with one stone: that is, we can solve the mistake of violating the rules (democratic rules, natural laws) of the American election, so that the Democratic Party will not always lose the election in the future due to the virtual electoral system overruling, distorting the only law of the real election of one person, one vote, and the minority obeying the majority, and it is unfair, against public opinion, and against the law of economic development, it can also truly implement the principle of constitutional sovereignty in the people, and basically make the democracy live up to its name. It is also an urgent need to solve many perennial problems in American society, especially the deadly problem of private gun ownership (in most countries in the world, private gun ownership is a crime, while a few countries allow private gun ownership, which is also caused by the United States. Lead to the people can not enjoy the most basic human rights – security, when everyone is in a state of tension day and night, not only against the physiological nerves, can not be happy and long life, and it is impossible to make the IQ in the ease of the following full play, and can not emerge numerous Einstein, it can be seen that allowing private guns, equal to the United States law, the government conniving in crime and even international crime!
It can be seen that allowing private guns is tantamount to US law and government condoning crimes and even international crimes! Since under the blackmail of the military-industrial complex such as the Rifle Association, all parties and politicians dare not plead for the people and allow the United States to fall into the abyss of civil war every day, then it is only reasonable to deliver a referendum! Military bosses dare to assassinate individual politicians of sense of justice, but do they dare and can slaughter hundreds of millions of voters? ! Dare to destroy the “beat swords into plows” sculpture that stands under the United Nations headquarters? ! Behind the statue of the United Nations stands the iron will of all mankind!) Only so, gradually can the United States become truly beautiful! Can be worthy of the world leader!
If even her voter votes is less than Trump, she should conduct a comprehensive review of the main reasons for the failure, which is not only to answer questions for all supporters, but also to warn the supporters and future generations, for the party’s next general election to develop strengths and avoid weaknesses, turn defeat into victory, do essential work.
These priorities are not only her responsibility as vice president, but also the obligation of her party’s candidate and the idol of hundreds of millions of voters! Moreover, she is one of the leaders of the Democratic Party, which is supposed to constantly correct the democratic system in the United States, what’s more, governments and people around the world are paying close attention to the politics and deduce of this and future US elections. If so, Harris will have triumphed in defeat, turning grief into strength! Her natural love of laughter was a universal delight to the people, It will also come true the proverb: The winner is the one who laughs at the end!
评论如下：
我们理解哈里斯及时发表败选演讲的初衷与这一主题，然而，不得不说该演讲存在重大的缺憾：她本应该先只是发表一个简短的声明：承认败选，承诺和平移交政权，但永不放弃责任！然后，再等到公布了各自候选人获得的全部选民票总数后，再作深度的全面的总结性演讲。因为——
如果她的选民票多于川普（如同上上届希拉里对决川普的结果），她在无奈遵守宪法、接受败选的同时，应理直气壮的指明美式选举制度对民主制的严重扭曲，并提出公平正义、科学可行的解决方案（详见我另外发表的实体性论文），在程序上的最佳方案就是，以联邦政府的名义把我多次建议的凡事特别是这种宪法性大事最后或首先提交全民公决，既然美国的独立宣言、宪法确立了最重要的原则：主权在民。那么，让全民公决来修改宪法就是天经地义的演义，就不得因宪法条文中没有这一修改程序而排斥人民主权，那只能说这宪法本身存在遗漏，自相矛盾，就理当补上这一直接民主的规定，正义可以迟到，但不可缺少！如此，就能一举两得：即能够解决美式大选违规（民主规则，自然规律）的错误，为民主党在今后的大选中不至于总是因虚拟的选举人制凌驾、扭曲了真实的一人一票、少数服从多数的选举唯一法则，而不公平、不合民意、也不合经济发展规律的败选，又能使宪法主权在民的原则真正得以落实，使民主制基本能名副其实，也是化解美国社会众多老大难问题特别是私人持枪的致命性问题所急需（在世界绝大多数国家私人持枪都是犯罪，而极少数国家允许私人持枪，也是因美国导致的，导致人民无法享有最基本的人权——安全，当人人日夜处于紧张状态时，不仅逆生理神经，无法幸福而长寿，而且，也不可能使智商在轻松自如下充分发挥，而无法层出不穷众多的爱因斯坦，可见，放任私人持枪，等于美国法律、政府纵容犯罪甚至国际犯罪！既然在步枪协会等军工复合企业软硬兼施的要挟下，各党派、政客都不敢为民请命，放任美国如同天天陷入内战深渊，那么，就理当、只需交付全民公决！军工老板敢暗杀个别富有正义感的政客，但他们敢于、能够屠杀亿万选民吗？！敢于毁灭屹立于联合国总部大楼下的那个“铸剑为犁”的天理雕塑吗？！联合国这雕塑的后面屹立着全人类嫉恶如仇的钢铁意志！），美国才能逐步的真正美好！才可能无愧为世界领袖！
如果连她本届获得选民票也少于川普，她则应该全面检讨此次失败的主要原因，那既是给全体支持者答疑解惑，更是警醒世人后人，为本党下一届大选扬长避短，反败为胜，做必不可少的工作。
这些重点，恐怕才不仅是她身为副总统的责任，也是本党候选人、亿万选民偶像的义务！何况，她是民主党领导人之一，民主党理应不断改正美国的民主制，更何况，世界各国政府及其人民都高度关注本届乃至未来美国大选政治及其演绎方向…若能如此，哈里斯才可以算是，虽败犹荣，成功的化悲痛为力量了！她天性的爱笑才能是全民也喜爱的欢笑，还会应验这句俗语：在最后笑者才是赢家—–
